Kada ne biste trebali graditi sustav

In most small businesses I work with, the instinct is to systematize too early.

Something goes wrong — a customer complaint, a missed deadline, a duplicated effort — and the response is immediate: we need a system for this. We need a process. We need software. We need documentation.

Sometimes that’s true. But often, the real answer is simpler: you need more customers, better execution, or just time.

The Overhead of Premature Systems

Systems aren’t free. Every system requires maintenance. Documentation needs updating. Software needs configuration. Processes need training. People need to remember which system applies to which situation.

When a business is small, this overhead can exceed the benefit. You spend more time maintaining the system than you save by having it.

Consider a business with three employees handling ten customer orders per week. They could build a sophisticated order management system with tracking, notifications, and escalation paths. Or they could just talk to each other.

At ten orders per week, talking works. The informal coordination — “hey, did you ship that?” — is faster and more reliable than any system. The system becomes worthwhile when informal coordination breaks down. Before that point, it’s overhead.

The Pain Isn’t Real Yet

Systems solve coordination problems. But coordination problems only emerge at certain scales.

A business doing fifty thousand in annual revenue doesn’t have the same coordination challenges as one doing five hundred thousand. The problems are different. The solutions should be different too.

What looks like a systems problem at fifty thousand is often a sales problem. The pain of disorganization isn’t coming from too much volume — it’s coming from not enough. The business doesn’t need better systems. It needs more customers.

This is uncomfortable to hear. Building systems feels productive. It feels like progress. Admitting that the real problem is insufficient demand feels like failure.

But misdiagnosing the problem makes it worse. Resources spent on systems are resources not spent on growth. The business gets more organized while getting no bigger. The systems become monuments to problems that never fully materialized.

When Systems Actually Make Sense

Systems become necessary when informal coordination stops scaling.

The signals are specific:

The same question gets asked repeatedly. Not occasionally — repeatedly. If three people ask the same thing in a week, that’s a pattern. One person asking once is just a question.

Information lives in one person’s head. When that person is sick, on vacation, or quits, everything stops. The business is hostage to individual memory.

Handoffs fail consistently. Work moves between people and something gets lost every time. Not sometimes — consistently. The pattern is reliable enough to predict.

Growth is blocked by capacity. You could take more customers, but you can’t handle them. The bottleneck isn’t demand — it’s the ability to fulfill.

These are real coordination problems. They justify the overhead of systems because the cost of not having systems exceeds the cost of maintaining them.

The Honest Assessment

Before building a system, ask: what happens if we don’t?

If the answer is “things continue roughly as they are,” you probably don’t need the system. The pain isn’t acute enough to justify the overhead.

If the answer is “we lose customers, miss deadlines, or burn out our team,” now you have a real problem. Systems make sense when the alternative is worse.

This requires honesty. It’s easy to catastrophize — to imagine all the things that could go wrong without proper systems. It’s harder to admit that most of those scenarios haven’t happened yet, and might not happen for a while.

The goal isn’t to have systems. The goal is to serve customers, generate revenue, and build something sustainable. Systems are one tool for doing that. They’re not the only tool, and they’re not always the right tool.

What to Do Instead

If you’re not ready for systems, what should you do?

Write things down, but loosely. A shared document with “how we usually handle X” is different from a formal process. It captures knowledge without creating rigidity.

Fix problems as they occur. When something goes wrong, fix it. Don’t build a system to prevent it from ever happening again — just fix it. If it happens repeatedly, then consider a system.

Focus on growth. The best cure for organizational messiness is often more business. Revenue creates resources. Resources enable systems. The sequence matters.

Wait for the real pain. Premature systems solve imaginary problems. Real systems solve real problems. You can tell the difference by how much it hurts. If it hurts enough to demand a solution, you’ll know.

Systems are powerful. But like any powerful tool, they need to match the scale of the problem. Using a system to solve a problem that doesn’t exist yet is like bringing a crane to hang a picture frame.

Wait until you need the crane.

---

Related

Understanding when systems are appropriate requires knowing what good systems actually look like. For more on the preconditions that make systems work, see: When Systems Are the Right Answer — a deeper examination of what needs to be true before systematization makes sense.